The native video hosting companies that are making the most noise in the market are also the ones that are giving the most feedback. I like to think of myself as a realist. I know that I can do better and I’m not going to stop trying.

But what does “better” mean? In the video hosting business, there are two types of companies, and both are important to the success of a site: those that make money by serving up content and those that make money from ads. For instance, in the early days of YouTube, the hosting companies that were making the most money were the ones that were serving up content (and thus, the ones that were making lots of money from ads).

In the early days, YouTube content creators were making money from ads, but the ads were a byproduct of making the most money while serving up content. The result is that content creators often have little or no control over the content they’re serving up. And as the YouTube model has evolved, the result has been that content creators are increasingly being charged for the ads that they’re serving up and that content creators rarely have the money to pay for a good quality ad.

If a website is not hosting itself, it can only serve up content on sites that are hosting it. Our goal in the new story trailer is to take a little bit of money out of what we’ve made up to a good point. The same applies to content creators.

The new story trailer, native video hosting, is a very positive move for a site that has been around for a long time. The way native video hosting works is that you pay for a site, it hosts your video, and you pay for the ad. This works well with our model because we can get a lot of value out of the ads that we serve up.

The new story trailer doesn’t just offer the opportunity to pay for a site to host your video, it offers the opportunity to pay for a site to serve your video ads. It’s a very positive move for a site that has been around for a long time.

This is the third time as a native video host that we have been asked to move our videos from YouTube to something else (we are the only one of our competitors to have done this). The move is a bit of a risk for our site because we are a very popular site that is built in a web-specific way (hence the ‘we’ in our name). We don’t think this is a good move for our community, but we are at least being proactive.

We don’t think this is a good move for our community, but we are at least being proactive. We think we could be the only one to actually implement it, but we don’t know if it will be in time for Q1 of 2010. You can get a sense of how the process works by looking at the video ads on our site. You can see the ad for our new video hosting service in the background.

As a community, we are extremely happy to be taking that first step and providing a solution for the hosting industry. But this is a very new industry and we really need some infrastructure (read: money) to do it. We at native video hosting are no strangers to this problem, having our own infrastructure is a big part of our growth as a company. We’ve been a part of the hosting industry for years, but only now are we putting our own resources into it.

If you’ve ever been to the mall, or in a bar, or in a bar, there are a lot of great places to go, so you can do that. But if you’re a video hosting company, the only company to have done this is the one with the most traffic on this site.